State License – Virginia

Virginia Insurance Fraud Law: The Bureau of Insurance Enforcement Framework

Insurance fraud costs Virginia policyholders real money — fraudulent claims drive up premiums, misrepresentation undermines the integrity of the risk po...

By Justin vom Eigen
Virginia Insurance Fraud Law: The Bureau of Insurance Enforcement Framework

Insurance fraud costs Virginia policyholders real money — fraudulent claims drive up premiums, misrepresentation undermines the integrity of the risk pool, and agent misconduct erodes client trust. Virginia's legal framework for addressing insurance fraud operates across multiple statutory chapters in Title 38.2, with the SCC Bureau of Insurance serving as the primary enforcement authority for market conduct and producer misconduct, and the Commonwealth's attorney system addressing criminal fraud. For producers, understanding the fraud framework is partly about knowing what the rules prohibit — and partly about understanding the reporting obligations that arise when fraud is suspected.

Virginia's Insurance Fraud Statute

Virginia's primary insurance fraud statute is found in Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia (the criminal code), not in Title 38.2. Va. Code § 18.2-178 (insurance fraud) prohibits:

Making any false statement or representation in any application for insurance

Making any false statement or representation in any claim for insurance benefits or payment

Assisting another in making such false representations

Insurance fraud under § 18.2-178 is a felony (Class 5, punishable by up to 10 years in prison) when the value involved exceeds $1,000, and a Class 1 misdemeanor for smaller amounts. Federal insurance fraud statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 1033-1034) additionally apply to persons engaged in the business of insurance, imposing federal criminal liability for willfully embezzling, stealing, or misappropriating insurance funds.

Title 38.2 Fraud-Related Provisions

Within Title 38.2, fraud-related obligations for producers and insurers appear across several chapters:

Chapter 5, § 38.2-510 — Unfair Claim Settlement Practices: It is an unfair practice to misrepresent pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to claims. This provision creates regulatory liability (civil penalties, license action) for adjusters and producers who misrepresent claims information, even if the conduct does not rise to criminal fraud.

Chapter 2 — General Enforcement: The SCC has authority to investigate any person engaging in insurance business and to examine records, issue cease and desist orders, impose civil penalties, and refer matters for criminal prosecution. The Bureau's market conduct examination authority extends to reviewing claim files, policy records, and agent transaction records.

Chapter 18, § 38.2-1826 — Producer Reporting Obligations: Virginia producers are required to report to the Bureau within 30 calendar days:

Any administrative action (license suspension, revocation, or discipline) taken against them in another jurisdiction

Any felony conviction

Any charge of a felony involving misappropriation, conversion, or theft of funds

Any civil judicial action involving fraud, misrepresentation, or dishonest dealing

The Bureau's Enforcement Authority Against Agents

The Bureau of Insurance enforces compliance through:

Market conduct examinations: The SCC has authority to examine the books, records, and accounts of any insurer or producer licensed in Virginia. Examinations can be triggered by consumer complaints, statistical anomalies, or as part of routine compliance review.

License suspension and revocation (§ 38.2-1831): The Bureau can suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a producer license for fraud, misrepresentation, misappropriation of premiums, twisting, rebating, and other violations of Title 38.2 or the criminal code. License action is separate from and in addition to any criminal prosecution.

Civil penalties: The SCC can assess civil money penalties for violations of Title 38.2, including fraud-related conduct.

Restitution: Under § 38.2-218, the Commission may order restitution for policyholders who have been harmed by a producer's illegal conduct, including misappropriation of premiums.

The $25 Referral Fee Rule and Related Prohibitions

The Bureau's enforcement guidance highlights a common area of producer confusion around the line between permissible business development and prohibited rebating or fraud:

Referral fees to unlicensed persons: A licensed producer may pay a one-time nominal fee to an unlicensed person for referrals. The Bureau's position is that a "nominal fee" cannot exceed $25 per referral. The referral payment cannot be contingent on whether the referred person actually purchases insurance — contingent fees are rebating.

Gifts and inducements: Offering any valuable consideration as an inducement to purchase insurance is prohibited rebating under § 38.2-509. Gifts, gift cards, or other items provided to clients who purchase a policy constitute rebating. The Bureau advises that if promotional items are given, they must be available to anyone who enters the agency regardless of whether they buy a policy.

Producer Record Retention as a Fraud Prevention Tool

Virginia's 3-year record retention requirement (§ 38.2-1809) serves a dual fraud-prevention purpose: it allows producers to document their own compliance with applicable rules, and it allows the Bureau to verify that documented transactions reflect what actually occurred. Adequate records are a producer's primary protection against disputed claims of misrepresentation or misconduct.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the producer's obligation when they suspect a client or claimant is committing insurance fraud?

Virginia does not impose a mandatory reporting requirement on producers for suspected consumer fraud in the same way some states do. However, producers who knowingly assist a client in filing a fraudulent claim may themselves be liable under Va. Code § 18.2-178 for aiding and abetting insurance fraud. The practical obligation is to refuse to participate in any transaction the producer believes is fraudulent and to consider whether a report to the insurer's SIU (Special Investigations Unit) or the Bureau of Insurance is appropriate under the circumstances. Producers who have reasonable suspicion of systematic fraud affecting their book of business should consult with legal counsel about reporting obligations and protections.

What happens to a producer's license if they are convicted of insurance fraud?

A felony conviction — including insurance fraud under § 18.2-178 or federal insurance fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1033 — is grounds for mandatory license revocation under § 38.2-1831. The producer must report the conviction to the Bureau within 30 calendar days of the conviction (not just after appeals are exhausted). The Bureau will initiate license revocation proceedings. Federal 18 U.S.C. § 1033 additionally imposes a lifetime bar on engaging in the business of insurance for anyone convicted under that statute, unless written consent is obtained from the applicable state insurance authority.

Can a Virginia producer be held liable for misrepresentation that does not rise to the level of criminal fraud?

Yes. Virginia's unfair trade practices statute (Title 38.2, Chapter 5) prohibits misrepresentation of policy terms, benefits, and financial condition of insurers as a matter of civil regulatory law — entirely separate from criminal fraud. A producer who misrepresents coverage terms to a client to secure a sale may not meet the criminal standard for fraud but can face: license suspension or revocation under § 38.2-1831, civil penalties under § 38.2-218, restitution orders, and potential civil liability to the client for damages. The civil regulatory standard is lower than the criminal standard — the Bureau does not need to prove criminal intent, only that the misrepresentation occurred and violated Title 38.2.

What is the Bureau's process for investigating a producer accused of misconduct?

When the Bureau receives a complaint or identifies potential misconduct through a market conduct examination, it can open an investigation. The process typically involves: (1) a request for the producer to provide records and a written response to the allegations; (2) review of policy files, transaction records, and correspondence; (3) if violations are identified, a notice of opportunity to cure or a formal hearing; (4) issuance of a consent order, cease and desist, or license action; and (5) if the conduct is criminal, referral to the appropriate Commonwealth's attorney or federal authorities. Producers who receive a Bureau inquiry should respond completely and promptly — failure to respond is itself a ground for license action — and should consider consulting with a licensed Virginia insurance attorney.

Does Virginia have a separate dedicated insurance fraud bureau like some other states?

Virginia does not have a separate standalone insurance fraud bureau equivalent to NJ's OIFP. Insurance fraud investigation in Virginia is handled through a combination of the SCC Bureau of Insurance (market conduct and producer misconduct), the Virginia State Police (criminal investigation), and the Commonwealth's attorneys (prosecution of criminal insurance fraud). The Bureau of Insurance does have an enforcement/compliance unit focused on market conduct and producer discipline. Federal insurance fraud falls under FBI jurisdiction and is prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys in Virginia's four federal judicial districts.

Virginia's insurance fraud framework is distributed across criminal statutes, the Title 38.2 regulatory system, and the Bureau's enforcement authority — producers who understand all three layers understand both what is prohibited and what the consequences of violations are.

Visit JustInsurance to enroll today and study Virginia's insurance law enforcement framework with a state-approved course built to the current Prometric content outline.

J

Justin vom Eigen

Founder & CEO, JustInsurance LLC

Justin vom Eigen is a licensed insurance agent and the founder of JustInsurance. He built the company after watching talented people fail outdated prelicensing exams — and has since trained over 20,000 students nationwide with a 93% first-attempt pass rate.

Learn more about Justin →